About

The opinions expressed in District 299: The Chicago Schools Blog are strictly those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Catalyst Chicago or the Community Renewal Society, its publisher.

Powered by Technorati

District299: The Chicago Schools Blog
Return To Main Blog Page
Sunday, July 6, 2008
No Flip-Flops For Obama In NEA Endorsement Acceptance

EIA's Mike Antonucci has the Obama speech to the NEA convention (via satellite).

Among other points (and hints at where the good parts on the video are), Antonucci says that Obama "took the bull by the horns" in talking about performance pay and charter schools (here).  No flip-flop there -- in contrast to campaign spending.

Over at the USA Today politics blog, Greg Toppo reports in as well (Mostly cheers, but some boos too, when Obama addresses teachers) with some additional observations and news -- Obama's relatively low NEA endorsement vote total, for example.  I want to know about Obama's sister, a teacher.  There's a McCain update, too.




Comments
Sat Jul 5, 2008 at 11:46 PMBy: Flip Flop Joke No Flip-Flops For Obama In NEA Endorsement Acceptance Ok, sure, this is an education blog so the NEA thing is fair fodder.

But campaign spending flip flops? McCain is breaking the campaign finance law and Obama changing his mind is the important reference to make? Heh. We'll never see McCain's opt-in/opt-out/opt-in again flip flops on campaign spending mentioned here. Politics on this blog is pretty much an embarrassment - regurgitating Republican propaganda against Obama. I know, fanning the flames makes for more hits, but still, it's pretty damn lame.

Keep drinking the Kool-Aid. Let's make just a short, admittedly incomplete, list of McCain flip flops:

Torture
Special Interests
Campaign Finance Laws
Campaign Spending Limits
Jerry Falwell
Iraq
Abortion
Tax Cuts
Ethanol
Gay Marriage
Confederate Flag
Gun Control
Moqtada al Sadr
Housing Relief
Hillary and the Media
Estate Tax
Wiretaps
Immigration Reform
Offshore Drilling
Hurricane Katrina Investigations
Guantanamo and Habeas Corpus
Oil Company Windfall Profits Tax
Social Security Privatization
Funding National Defense
Florida Everglades Protection
Sun Jul 6, 2008 at 9:07 AMBy: George N. Schmidt No Flip-Flops For Obama In NEA Endorsement Acceptance None of the three main positions stated by Oabam at the NEA convention should surprise anyone from Chicago. Obama has been in the Daley camp on corporate "school reform" from his days in the General Assembly.

Hence, "No Child Left Behind" gets supported (with all the double talk about unfunded mandates, but not critique of high stakes multiple choice computer scored so-called "standardized" tests).

His support for merit pay was announced (to boos) at last year's NEA RA.

And his support for charter schools is longstanding. In fact, in the NEA speech yesterday, be brags that he even supported expanding (Chicago-only) charters while he served in the General Assembly.

At least in these things of corporate "education reform," Obama is consistent with his own corporate record and corporate praxis.

The disappointed are those vast throngs across the USA who thought that a family with corporate and political ties to the ruling class in Chicago was really an agent of the kind of "change" that most people in the USA are demanding today. The Obamas want the same kind of "reform" and "change" as are wanted by the Pritzkers and Ariel Capital Management people.

It's slightly different from some of the agenda of the Bush oil cowboys, but not by much -- and certainly not what his legions of workers had in mind (for the most part) when they formed the infantry of his amazing nomination machine.
Mon Jul 7, 2008 at 1:53 AMBy: Danny No Flip-Flops For Obama In NEA Endorsement Acceptance There won't be any difference as far as education goes whether Obama or McCain win the presidency.

There will be an increase in education spending regardless. Even Bush had significant increases to NCLB.

And NCLB may get renamed, but it will be reapproved in pretty much the same form as it is now. Minor tweaks.

From kindergarten through graduate school, Obama has never attended a public school. What do you expect?
Mon Jul 7, 2008 at 3:06 AMBy: George N. Schmidt No Flip-Flops For Obama In NEA Endorsement Acceptance As important as the kinds of schools Barack Obama attended (after all, his wife Michelle is a graduate of Chicago's Whitney Young Magnet High School) are the policies he has supported since he gained political power in the Illinois General Assembly. His record has been unswerving support for the agenda of the Daley administration -- privatization, union busting, test-based "accountability," charter schools, and, most recently, merit pay. With No Child Left Behind having had its most avid Big City Mayor Fan Club here in Chicago since 2002, there was adequate time for Barack Obama to do some criticism of the mayor's corporate "school reform" agenda and its national counterpart, both under the Clinton administration's "school reform" plans and since the election of George W. Bush and the bipartisan support for No Child Left Behind.

One of the most interesting things about Obama's record (to me at least) has been his support for segregated charter schools in Chicago, but for few or no charter schools in Illinois outside Chicago. Since Mayor Daley's version of "school reform" has always been "separate and unequal" (with the maintenance of 300 all-black, mostly serving poor children, public elementary and high schools), the politicians who supported Daley's plans and programs (and the two CEOs who implemented those programs, Paul Vallas and Arne Duncan) have been among the most consistent segregationists of the 21st Century.

Examined at ground level, in a vast area stretching from Austin Blvd. on the West Side all the way out to 135th St. in Altgeld Gardens on the far South Side, the "audacity" here has been the ability to market a Chicago politician who has supported several 19th Century realities (massive segregation; union busting; privatization as opposed to public service) as "Change We Can Believe In..."

As I have said before.

I've voted for the guy before and will vote for him again.

But not because this election is going to yield any major changes in the corporate "reform" agendas of the past 18 years:

"School Reform"

"Housing Reform" and

"Welfare Reform"

have all been an attack on some very basic and necessary public programs in the USA, and a source of massive wealth for those who profited from the privatization (and in most cases, emiseration) of the poor and working class people who were the victims of those programs.
Mon Jul 7, 2008 at 7:02 AMBy: Marricat No Flip-Flops For Obama In NEA Endorsement Acceptance I don't see any real difference between the two candidates in the area of education, welfare, immigration, women's rights, LGBT rights, or any other topic that is important to me. I will vote for Obama more as a protest against the Bush administration then anything else. Bush has put our economy as close to a depression as we have been for years. He has destroyed the middle class and there are no signs that things will get any better. I wish that we really had a candidate that would make a difference but I guess that is just a dream.

top
Add Your Comment

By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. District 299 reserves the right to delete or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule, and to ban anyone who violates this rule. Reader comments are limited to 500 words.





Comment:
Just so we know you're a human and not a spammer, please answer the following question: + =