Teachers call for better professional development: report

Print More
Educators 4 Excellence, a national group that launched a chapter in Chicago last year, wants to have "Iowa-style caucuses" to determine issues to focus on.

Educators 4 Excellence, a national group that launched a chapter in Chicago last year, wants to have "Iowa-style caucuses" to determine issues to focus on.

Over half of CPS teachers surveyed for a small-scale study by an education policy group said they do not regularly use strategies learned in professional development provided by the district.

In addition, nine out of 10 said have rarely or never used the district’s online professional development tool, Learning Hub.

The study of 220 teachers by the group Educators 4 Excellence reinforced long-standing complaints by many teachers that the district’s ongoing training for them is ineffective. The report highlighted ineffective practices and offered recommendations for improvement.

E4E listed four main problems with PD: inconsistent quality across the district; a disconnect between PD and the district’s teacher evaluation system, which is supposed to point teachers toward areas where they can improve; a lack of communication about what PD is provided; and few avenues for teachers to give feedback on PD they have received.

“I definitely see that in a district of 22,000 teachers, it’s hard to feel a personal connection,” says Laura Ferdinandt, CPS Manager of Teacher Leadership and Professional Development, after hearing the results. “We’ve got the foundations built. It’s just a matter of communicating.”

Last fall, E4E conducted a preliminary survey of over 300 teachers and identified PD as a main issue on which to focus. Five district teachers, who are also E4E members, volunteered at a March dinner to conduct a follow-up survey to identify specific problems and offer solutions.

“As a young teacher, I’m eager and hungry for knowledge,” says Brooke Craig, a member of the five- person team and a first-grade teacher at the Morton School of Excellence, an Academy for Urban School Leadership school on the West Side.

Suggesting solutions

E4E is a national policy organization founded in New York in 2010, with chapters in Connecticut, New York, Minnesota and California. The Chicago chapter launched last July. The group, which reserves half of its board seats for teachers, is funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates and Broad foundations nationally. In Chicago, The Joyce Foundation and Osa Foundation provide support.

The organization relies on word-of-mouth to increase its membership and the Chicago chapter has had 799 members join since its launch. After joining, E4E members sign a declaration that outlines the organization’s support for issues that include eliminating seniority-based layoffs, reframing how teachers are evaluated for tenure, and using student achievement data as a measure of teacher effectiveness.

(The declaration also states that “We know there is no factor more important to student success than the quality of our instruction,” though among all factors, family income remains the strongest predictor of high achievement. Among in-school factors, teacher quality ranks at the top.)

Among its solutions, the team recommended creating a teacher advisory board; reinstating four PD days per year, which were eliminated to lengthen the school year for students; providing principal training on how to connect PD to teacher evaluations; and incorporating a more user-friendly ratings system for Learning Hub, modeled after websites like Yelp or Amazon.

Theresa Insalaco-DiCicco, a professional development facilitator at CPS who serves as a liaison to the CTU, said the responsibility of improving PD shouldn’t fall solely on the district.

“It is also the teacher’s responsibility to look for some of these things. That’s part of what made me a little frustrated with today,” when the report was issued, Insalaco-DiCicco says

Acasia Wilson Feinberg, the executive director of E4E’s Chicago chapter, says the organization has felt welcomed by Chicago teachers in its first year on the ground.

“Having a place where there’s a solution-oriented conversation is very important,” Wilson Feinberg says, “We saw that demand.”

Evan Stone, co-CEO and co-founder of E4E, said conversations on PD in Chicago will continue, but the process to identify more teacher challenges will start over again “Iowa caucus style,” with participating teachers voting this summer on the next set of issues for E4E to tackle.

Editor’s note: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that Crown Family Philanthropies provides support for Educators 4 Excellence. Catalyst regrets the error.

 Photo: Books on teacher’s desk/Shutterstock.com

 

  • Concerned Parent

    The Learning Hub is a horrible system – instead of improving upon the CPS professional development enrollment system, which was the very poor CPS University, CPS made this new system worse. Where is the accountability?

  • Concerned Parent

    Ms. Insalaco-DiCicco, CPS teachers do seek and attend GREAT workshops provided by the CTU. Do you and your highly paid ‘presenters’ even attend to learn how well their workshops are?
    Why not dissolve your costly department, (What does everyone paid there really do all summer – all year?) and give the money for CTU? Then CTU could offer even more classes to teachers at other locations than their office.
    What an innovated idea – which means it will never happen as your jobs continue to be cost-inefficient to tax payers and irrelevant to teachers.

    • Theresa Insalaco-DeCicco

      @disqus_aLbKtbx3ad:disqus “CPS teachers do seek and attend GREAT workshops provided by the CTU”… I know, I give them. Thank you for the compliment. You misunderstood my statement and did not understand my position. The person who quoted me cut out most of what I said. Please feel free to call me with any questions.

  • Dedicated1

    “It is also the teacher’s responsibility to look for some of these…” what? Crappy PDs? Dude. Many of us work 55 to 60 hours a week and have 3 degrees etc. I do. We can spot a bulls*&t PD from a mile away. Give us something that works and we’ll listen. You want us to toy around with Learning Hub? I’m still recovering from toying around with the horrible REACH interface and that whole meaningless nonsense. I know it’s your paycheck – but that doesn’t make it worthwhile. Our job is teaching kids, not supporting politically-connected patronage jobs.

  • xian

    Wait, now anyone with money can pre-select a group and call it a “study”?

    Seems like whomever ever thought this up didn’t have a lot of “rigor” in their own science education.

    90% of the people I made sign a pledge saying that they think pledges are stupid thought that pledges are stupid.