Teacher residency rule one thing CPS gets right

Print More
Dave Stieber, history teacher

Dave Stieber, history teacher

A former colleague of mine recently wrote an op-ed stating that Chicago Public Schools should end the requirement that to work in CPS you must live in the city of Chicago limits.

There are a lot of things that CPS does that I strongly disagree with—from having mayoral control of the system to not having an elected school board to an overall top-down, undemocratic way of running schools. But the rule requiring that you must live in Chicago to teach in CPS is one rule that CPS gets right.

As teachers we have a moral obligation to help make the lives of our students better. One way to do that is to make the city that we all live in better. At times, there is already a disconnect between the experiences of our students’ lives and the experiences that we teachers have. The thing is, even if we don’t live in the specific neighborhood in which our school is located, if we live in the city we are infinitely more aware of what life is like for our students than, say, if we commuted from one of the surrounding suburbs.

Yes, I could have my students share their experiences so I could attempt to understand and relate to them. But the disconnect between teachers and students will only be greater if they live in Englewood or South Chicago and I live in Orland Park, Oak Park, or Schaumburg.

We owe it to our students as voters, taxpayers, and parents to have a political, economic, and educational stake in this city.

The 40,000 teachers who work for CPS are an important voice in the electoral process, as we have seen with the most recent mayoral and alderman election. The actions of the teachers who make up the Chicago Teachers Union are changing the way schools are run and the way this city is run. Without this voting privilege, we would have significantly fewer tangible ways to exert positive change for our students.

About building connections

We owe it to our students to pay taxes to this city to help improve it for everyone. Yes, the way the money is used or not used needs to be improved, but politicians need our revenue to pay for those improvements. These same politicians also need our voices to pressure them to use our revenue the way that it should be used.

We owe it to our students to be teachers who not only work in CPS but also send our kids to CPS. By doing so, we obviously will have more at stake in wanting to improve the schools for all children.

Teaching is about building connections with our students. We teachers may differ from our students in terms of race and/or economic status. But when we live in the city, pay taxes here and send our kids to public schools, our students will see that despite our differences, we also share many common bonds–most importantly, the desire to improve the city that we all call home.

We teachers love and care about our students. That is why discussions about the teacher residency rule, and any and everything else that impacts our careers as teachers, are vital.

But to truly care about and fight for the schools our students deserve, we must also live in and fight for the city that we all deserve.

David Stieber is a father, husband and history teacher in Chicago. He earned his masters in Urban Education Policy Studies from the University of Illinois at Chicago. Follow Dave on Twitter at D_Stieber.

  • Jeanne Marie Olson

    Bravo. Well said.

  • Concerned Parent

    Your pension-school are in trouble with Rahm. There will be more schools closing-high schools-more charters coming. You who live in Chicago; take this advantage – please go vote in April and get your city friends to do the same.

  • Maria Guerrero

    So how much does the President of the Board of Ed. care about Chicago’s kids when he lives in Winnetka ?

  • Riddle Me This

    What a great article by a CPS teacher! This article surprised the heck out of me as most teachers want carte blanche to live anywhere they want as part of their entitlement issues. While, police officers, fireman, and all other city workers don’t have the luxury of being grandfathered-in with the old residency policy or can’t get a residency waiver for a need basis subject area like many CPS teachers and staffers do and they must live in Chicago.

    Why is there even a residency waiver anymore as the CTU claims 7000 teachers lost their jobs in the past few years? And, why do PE teachers and counselors get a residency waiver in the first place?

  • Northside

    I agree with what you say. I agree with the political and tax base argument 100 percent. On other issues I do not. However, people do have life events that do come up. One of those is the need to care for a sick parent living outside of the city. Under our current rules a teacher can’t move to a parents house help them with health issues outside of the city. As we all know, some teacher’s parents may be living on fixed income and a may need the help of their children. The rule specifically states that there is no “hardship exceptions”. Exactly how is this “getting it right”. We have a moral obligation to our students, but we also have a moral obligation to our family and friends. I agree with the tax base concept. However, the idea that a teacher living in the Ukraine Village is somehow connected to his students neighborhood in Englewood doesn’t really make sense to me? Especially when in reality a a teacher in Brookfield probably has more of a connection to Bridgeport than a a teacher living in the Gold Coast or Bucktowns million dollar streets. Again, if CPS would just be honest and say that it is for tax revenue I would be ok. However, the idea that a teacher will be closer to their students is quite a stretch. One more example, Evanston is closer to Rogers Park than Pullman is to Rogers Park . Exactly how is teacher connected to his students neighborhood when he lives in Lincoln Park and his students live in Back of the Yards. Just be honest CPS. We are not that “dumb”.